Evidence record 16564 · automatically gathered

AI Alignment and Fiduciary Obligation

Advanced AI assistants engage users in extended interactions across a widening range of roles, including advice, decision support, collaboration, learning, emotional support, and companionship among others. Current alignment efforts consider what alignment criteria should govern these relationships, drawing on moral traditions developed for human relationships such as bioethics, virtue ethics, care ethics, and relationship science. This paper considers AI alignment criteria in the user-AI-develo

Record details

Published: 1 August 2026
Source: arXiv alignment query
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 5 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (1 August 2026), “AI Alignment and Fiduciary Obligation,” evidence record 16564, https://ethics.ai/record/16564 (originally published by arXiv alignment query).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.