Evidence record 16406 · automatically gathered

High-profile anesthesiologists earning retractions for data, image problems

In July 2021, John Loadsman received a manuscript about a clinical trial that immediately roused his suspicion. Then the editor-in-chief of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Loadsman asked the authors for the raw data. They weren’t pretty. “When I looked carefully at the spreadsheet, I could see entire blocks of data that were repeated,” recalled Loadsman, … Continue reading High-profile anesthesiologists earning retractions for data, image problems

Record details

Published: 4 August 2026
Source: Retraction Watch
Category: News
Topics: Healthcare · Biotech
Retrieved: 5 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (4 August 2026), “High-profile anesthesiologists earning retractions for data, image problems,” evidence record 16406, https://ethics.ai/record/16406 (originally published by Retraction Watch).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.