Socially Grounded Agentic AI: Coordinating Plural Perspectives through Social Theory
As AI systems are deployed across increasingly diverse social contexts, alignment can no longer be framed as the optimization of a single, unified set of values. Instead, systems must be able to recognize, represent, and respond to multiple legitimate perspectives. This has led to growing interest in pluralistic alignment, which seeks to move beyond one-size-fits-all models of appropriate behaviour. However, current approaches often lack a clear account of how values are socially organized, cont
Record details
Published: 4 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 5 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
When Privileged Guidance Misaligns: State-Matched Routing and Contextualized Self-Distillation for Multi-Turn Agents
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 4 August 2026
Agent Against Agent: An Agentic System for Automatic Prompt Injection Red Teaming
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 4 August 2026
IntentLint: Supporting Intent Scaffolding and Prompt-time Linting in Human-AI Collaborative Data Analysis
arXiv cs.HC · 5 August 2026
Agent Against Agent: An Agentic System for Automatic Prompt Injection Red Teaming
arXiv red teaming query · 5 August 2026
From Profiling to Synthesis: Benchmarking Implicit Behavioral Alignment in Personalized LLM Agents
arXiv · 3 August 2026
MemSIF: From Structured Interactions to Dual-Track Fact Memory for LLM Agents
arXiv · 3 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 August 2026), “Socially Grounded Agentic AI: Coordinating Plural Perspectives through Social Theory,” evidence record 16263, https://ethics.ai/record/16263 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.