Evidence record 16168 · automatically gathered

The Boy Who Cried Wolf: Adversarial Misclassification of Safe Inputs as Unsafe in Multimodal Guardrails

Multimodal guard models have emerged as critical safety components for screening content in vision-language systems. While adversarial research has extensively studied jailbreaking attacks that produce false negatives, the inverse threat of inducing false positives on benign inputs remains unexplored. We introduce Unsafe Induction Attacks, where adversaries distribute imperceptibly perturbed safe images that trigger guard models to reject legitimate user requests, causing a "Boy Who Cried Wolf"

Record details

Published: 2 August 2026
Source: arXiv red teaming query
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment
Retrieved: 4 August 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (2 August 2026), “The Boy Who Cried Wolf: Adversarial Misclassification of Safe Inputs as Unsafe in Multimodal Guardrails,” evidence record 16168, https://ethics.ai/record/16168 (originally published by arXiv red teaming query).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.