Continuous Face Authentication on Mobile and Desktop Platforms: A Comparative Study
Personal devices hold sensitive data and provide access to sensitive services. Conventional personal device authentication verifies users' identity only at the moment access is granted. An unlocked device may be accessed by an unauthorized person if the user stops using the device without locking it, or if another person takes over. Continuous authentication addresses this gap. This paper investigates how device type and usage conditions influence continuous mobile face authentication with an In
Record details
Published: 1 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.HC
Category: Research
Topics: Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 4 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
A comprehensive review of benchmark datasets for deep learning-based medical image segmentation
Artificial Intelligence Review · 1 August 2026
PartInteractor: Intent-Driven Part-Aware 3D Authoring for Continuous Co-Creation in XR
arXiv cs.HC · 2 August 2026
No Single Neuron of Failure: Distributed Safety Alignment Against White-Box Attacks
arXiv red teaming query · 2 August 2026
Symbolic Attack Chain Generation from Atomic Red Team Techniques: An Empirical Study of Predicate Representation Granularity
arXiv red teaming query · 31 July 2026
Exploratory Integration of EEG Spectral Features and Gaze Variability for Mild Cognitive Impairment Discrimination
arXiv cs.HC · 31 July 2026
A Data-Centric Perspective on Tree Visualizations
arXiv cs.HC · 2 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (1 August 2026), “Continuous Face Authentication on Mobile and Desktop Platforms: A Comparative Study,” evidence record 16165, https://ethics.ai/record/16165 (originally published by arXiv cs.HC).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.