Human-Centered Reflections on Care Robots: A Comparative Study of Caregiver Perspectives
Care robots are increasingly being introduced into healthcare settings, raising important questions about their acceptance and ethical implementation. To better understand these challenges, this study investigates caregivers' perceptions of four categories of care robots: delivering supplies, helping patients into bed, monitoring vital signs, and assisting with mobility. We conducted a mixed-methods study employing a mixed-factorial design in which 298 caregivers from the United States, Mexico,
Record details
Published: 3 August 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Agents & autonomy · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 4 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
From Siloed Algorithms to Compliance-First Agentic Platforms: A Multi-Layered Architecture for Hospital AI Systems
arXiv · 6 August 2026
YAQIN: Culturally Sensitive, Agentic AI for Mental Healthcare Support Among Muslim Women in the UK
arXiv · 8 March 2026
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review of Advancements in Diagnostics, Treatment, and Operational Efficiency
OpenAlex · 1 January 2025
Loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT3-enabled chatbots
OpenAlex · 22 January 2024
Guideline-as-Oracle: Zero-Annotation Training of an Ophthalmic Telephone Triage Agent
arXiv cs.AI · 5 August 2026
PATHFinder Agent for Tailored Prenatal Care
arXiv cs.CY · 29 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (3 August 2026), “Human-Centered Reflections on Care Robots: A Comparative Study of Caregiver Perspectives,” evidence record 15875, https://ethics.ai/record/15875 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.