Digital Engagement, Income Disparities, and Job Seeking in the United States since 2010
arXiv:2511.05294v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Surveys often record how frequently people use the internet without measuring the infrastructures, skills, and support systems that make digital participation possible. Using the U.S. National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 cohort, we study how internet-use frequency relates to labor income, employment attachment, and job seeking after 2010. The main digital-engagement analysis uses the comparable 2011, 2013, and 2015 waves, with 2017 retain
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Jobs & economy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
At cross purposes? Housing markets and innovation in American Political Economy
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
How technological progress in robotics, AI, and IT/ICT/IoT reshapes employment: A robust analysis for the United States
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 14 July 2026
Artificial intelligence exposure and labor market transformations in Latin America
Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 14 July 2026
Federal Cuts and Public Health: Social Media Sentiment Among Federal Employees
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 15 July 2026
Open Veins of Algorithmic Auditing: Why AI Assessment Lags Behind Its Deployment in the Global South
arXiv · 23 July 2026
Cost-of-Ethics Crisis: Beliefs, Decisions, and Justifications in the Job Searches of Computer Science Students in Canada and the United States
arXiv cs.CY · 5 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “Digital Engagement, Income Disparities, and Job Seeking in the United States since 2010,” evidence record 1569, https://ethics.ai/record/1569 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.