FairFund-Bench: Evaluating Distributive Bias in LLM Resource Allocation
arXiv:2607.28934v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly involved in the distribution of scarce resources, raising concerns about biased allocations based on characteristics like race and gender. Recent LLM audits have produced inconsistent results, however, finding evidence of both positive and negative discrimination towards women and ethnic minorities, even for the same models. We show that this disagreement can arise from differences in audit format and
Record details
Published: 3 August 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Transparency
Retrieved: 3 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Chain-of-Models: Cross-Model Auditing for Bias-Robust LLM Judges
arXiv cs.CY · 3 August 2026
Ethical use of artificial intelligence in education: proposed ethical competency framework for teachers
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 3 August 2026
Trustworthy AI in Digital Health: A Comprehensive Review of Robustness and Explainability
arXiv · 3 August 2026
Who Should Be Generated? Justifying Demographic Targets in Open-Ended Generation
arXiv · 3 August 2026
GoT-CD: Graph-of-Thoughts Causal Discovery and the Fragility of Post-hoc Path-Specific Fairness Audits
arXiv fairness query · 3 August 2026
AIDLC–governance indicator framework: a lifecycle-based approach to institutional AI governance
AI & Society · 4 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (3 August 2026), “FairFund-Bench: Evaluating Distributive Bias in LLM Resource Allocation,” evidence record 15648, https://ethics.ai/record/15648 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.