Weekend reads: University and journal investigating gene-editing death; ADA ‘must take accountability’; psychedelic therapy paper faces retraction
If your week flew by — we know ours did — catch up here with what you might have missed. The week at Retraction Watch featured: In case you missed the news, the Hijacked Journal Checker now has more than 450 entries. The Retraction Watch Database has over 66,000 retractions. Our list of COVID-19 retractions … Continue reading Weekend reads: University and journal investigating gene-editing death; ADA ‘must take accountability’; psychedelic therapy paper faces retraction
Record details
Published: 1 August 2026
Source: Retraction Watch
Category: News
Topics: Transparency · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 2 August 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Journal, university investigations launched into gene-editing death following Science-Retraction Watch reporting
Retraction Watch · 30 July 2026
Exclusive: A couple paid more than $800,000 for a gene-editing therapy for their daughter. She died, and it wasn’t made public
Retraction Watch · 23 July 2026
The AI industry is rallying around open models. Is it more than talk?
Fast Company · 30 July 2026
The AI industry is rallying around open models. Is it more than talk?
Fast Company · 30 July 2026
The AI industry is rallying around open models. Is it more than talk?
Fast Company · 30 July 2026
The AI industry is rallying around open models. Is it more than talk?
Fast Company · 30 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (1 August 2026), “Weekend reads: University and journal investigating gene-editing death; ADA ‘must take accountability’; psychedelic therapy paper faces retraction,” evidence record 15612, https://ethics.ai/record/15612 (originally published by Retraction Watch).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.