Robo-Reporters: Evaluating Autonomous AI Agents as Algorithmic Gatekeepers in Computational Journalism
arXiv:2607.10736v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Artificial intelligence agents increasingly perform journalism tasks autonomously, searching for sources, evaluating credibility, and producing news content with minimal human oversight. Yet research has largely treated AI as a monolithic category, leaving the effects of architectural design unexamined. Drawing on gatekeeping theory, this study presents the first systematic comparison of four agent architectures, monolithic (Claude), chain-based (L
Record details
Published: 14 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Learning in Blocks: A Multi Agent Debate Assisted Personalized Adaptive Learning Framework for Language Learning
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
Automated Textbook Auditing with Multi-Agent LLM Systems
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
Intervenability as a Design Requirement for Autonomy and Oversight within Human-Centered AI
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
Transfer Learning Across Policy Regimes in Adaptive Multi-Agent Systems
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
From Tools to Teacher-Built Teammates: No-Code Pedagogical Plugin Authoring with LearnAdapt Agentic Studio and PedOS 1.1 Lumina
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
Isolation as a First-Class Principle for LLM-Agent System Safety: Concepts, Taxonomy, Challenges and Future Directions
arXiv · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 July 2026), “Robo-Reporters: Evaluating Autonomous AI Agents as Algorithmic Gatekeepers in Computational Journalism,” evidence record 1515, https://ethics.ai/record/1515 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.