A Right Not to Move
What does Union citizenship, traditionally dependent on a cross-border element, offer to those who have never exercised their right to free movement? For more than a decade, the position of “static Union citizens” has remained confined to the exceptional protection recognised in Zambrano. In its recent judgment in Safi, delivered on 4 June 2026, the ECJ extended those limits. The judgment established that Union citizenship protects static minor Union citizens from being forced to move within the
Record details
Published: 30 July 2026
Source: Verfassungsblog (EU law incl AI)
Category: Field notes
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 31 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Private International Law and European Society
Verfassungsblog (EU law incl AI) · 6 July 2026
Notes from the IAPP Europe: DSA and DMA enforcement, return of CSAM detection
IAPP · 30 July 2026
Should You Use AI for a Task? Here’s a Simple Way to Decide
Bruce Schneier — Schneier on Security · 30 July 2026
Best in Class: Stream PC Games and Study on the Same Laptop With GeForce NOW
NVIDIA Blog (AI) · 30 July 2026
Quoting Bruce Schneier
Simon Willisons Weblog · 30 July 2026
Europe’s summer of fires: Burnham must centre climate adaptation in policies
Chatham House · 31 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (30 July 2026), “A Right Not to Move,” evidence record 15066, https://ethics.ai/record/15066 (originally published by Verfassungsblog (EU law incl AI)).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.