Can LVLMs Uncover the Truth Behind Visual Illusions? An Analysis of Perceptual and Reasoning Capabilities
Large Vision Language Models have integrated reasoning capabilities, elevating cognitive performance to new levels. However, existing evaluations either focus solely on perception or rely on specific domains such as maths or coding. Evaluation for reasoning capabilities that align with an open-world environment is still required, especially one that considers perception and reasoning jointly. To bridge this gap, we propose to evaluate LVLMs by exploiting visual illusions as a diagnostic tool. Vi
Record details
Published: 30 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Environment
Retrieved: 31 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Change2Task: From Repository Changes to Executable Coding Agent Tasks and Environments
arXiv cs.LG · 30 July 2026
RAG-HAR+: Towards Cost-Efficient LLM-Based Human Activity Recognition for Edge Deployment
arXiv cs.LG · 29 July 2026
StatePlay: State-Aware Game World Models for Mechanics-Consistent Generation
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 28 July 2026
Development of FDD-ON: an Ontology for VAV HVAC System Fault Detection and Diagnostics
arXiv cs.AI · 31 July 2026
Benchmarking the Safety of Large Language Models for Robotic Health Attendant Control
arXiv cs.CY · 27 July 2026
Explainable Reinforcement Learning for assisting Air Traffic Controllers
arXiv cs.AI · 24 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (30 July 2026), “Can LVLMs Uncover the Truth Behind Visual Illusions? An Analysis of Perceptual and Reasoning Capabilities,” evidence record 14968, https://ethics.ai/record/14968 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.