What Nasscom wants changed in the Supreme Court’s draft AI rules
Nasscom has urged the Supreme Court to define high-risk AI use and clarify that technical audits should not automatically require source code disclosure. The post What Nasscom wants changed in the Supreme Court’s draft AI rules appeared first on MEDIANAMA .
Record details
Published: 29 July 2026
Source: MediaNama (IN)
Category: News
Topics: Transparency
Retrieved: 30 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Bank of Baroda launches forensic probe after customer data appears on dark web
MediaNama (IN) · 27 July 2026
Why has Nitin Gadkari sued Meta, X and Google over AI deepfakes?
MediaNama (IN) · 28 July 2026
Apple briefly pulls Telegram from App Store over child sexual abuse material, restores it within hours
MediaNama (IN) · 4 August 2026
Reading List: Impact of the use of AI in Spam Prevention, New Delhi, 12 August 2026 #NAMA
MediaNama (IN) · 7 August 2026
How would Airtel detect hotspot use amid questions over its Unlimited 5G policy?
MediaNama (IN) · 20 July 2026
Karnataka to set up direct social media response framework as other states step up online content enforcement
MediaNama (IN) · 17 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 July 2026), “What Nasscom wants changed in the Supreme Court’s draft AI rules,” evidence record 14846, https://ethics.ai/record/14846 (originally published by MediaNama (IN)).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.