SecRespond: Benchmarking AI Agents for Real-World Post-Compromise Incident Response
Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly adopted in real-world security operations with access to host artifacts and command-line interfaces (CLIs), making it critical to thoroughly assess their security capabilities. However, existing cybersecurity benchmarks focus on pre-compromise settings where agents are placed in a clean and idealized environment before an attack occurs. This leaves the post-compromise setting underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce SecRespond, the first
Record details
Published: 29 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.AI
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 30 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
BioVLN: A Simulation Platform for Visual Language Navigation in Biomedical Laboratories
arXiv cs.AI · 29 July 2026
Rethinking Self-Evolution: A Constrained Exploration-Exploitation Process for Mitigating Skill Overfitting
arXiv · 29 July 2026
Eco3S: Complex Socio-Economic System Simulation via Agent-Based Models
arXiv · 29 July 2026
Model or Harness? An Interaction-Centric Taxonomy for Localizing Agent Failures
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 29 July 2026
Echoverse: Deep, Evolving Environments for Training Computer-Use Agents at Scale
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 29 July 2026
Harness-G: A Graph-Structured Harness for Search Agents
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 29 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 July 2026), “SecRespond: Benchmarking AI Agents for Real-World Post-Compromise Incident Response,” evidence record 14821, https://ethics.ai/record/14821 (originally published by arXiv cs.AI).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.