From Risk Classification to Action Plan Remediation: A Guardrail Feedback Driven Framework for LLM Agents
LLM-based guardrails typically safeguard agents by evaluating proposed actions or inputs before execution, producing safety signals such as binary allow/deny decisions, risk categories, and/or explanatory rationales about potential policy violations. However, agent risks often arise when otherwise benign tasks are contaminated by untrusted external content, unsafe instructions, or risky tool use. Existing guardrails often flag the entire task uniformly as unsafe, thereby blocking the threat but
Record details
Published: 4 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
PACT: Self-Evolving Physical Safety Alignment for Diffusion Policies in Embodied Manipulation
arXiv · 7 June 2026
CHORUS: Decentralized Multi-Embodiment Collaboration with One VLA Policy
arXiv · 10 June 2026
Should LLM Agents Decide in Social Simulations? Comparing Finite-State and LLM-Based Decision Policies
arXiv · 10 June 2026
Relevance as a Vulnerability: How Web Retrieval Degrades Safety Alignment in LLM Agents
arXiv · 28 May 2026
Regulating the Machine Contributor: Governance and Policy Alignment in Open Source
arXiv · 12 June 2026
Intelligence as Managed Autonomy: Failure, Escalation, and Governance for Agentic AI Systems
arXiv · 26 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 June 2026), “From Risk Classification to Action Plan Remediation: A Guardrail Feedback Driven Framework for LLM Agents,” evidence record 1444, https://ethics.ai/record/1444 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.