San Francisco: Don’t Fall for Industry Defense of Surveillance Pricing
The concept of “surveillance pricing” is just one part of a much larger problem and business model: corporations maximizing their profits by invading our privacy. The all-too-common business model is to systematically harvest, collate, and store as much of our personal data as possible, and then monetize it through use and sale. When it comes to surveillance pricing, that looks like corporations offering the same product to two different people at two different prices, based on harvested persona
Record details
Published: 28 July 2026
Source: EFF Deeplinks
Category: Field notes
Topics: Privacy · Military & security
Retrieved: 29 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Victory! Flock Ends Rollout of Audio “Distress Detection” of Human Voices
EFF Deeplinks · 17 July 2026
Too Little, Too Late: Flock Admits Their Technology Needs Reforms
EFF Deeplinks · 13 August 2026
Lawmakers Must Act Now to Prevent Armed Police Drones
EFF Deeplinks · 26 June 2026
PRESS RELEASE: Coalition Challenges Dramatic Data Privacy Changes to Federal Assistance Program
EPIC · 3 August 2026
PRESS RELEASE: Coalition Challenges Dramatic Data Privacy Changes to Federal Assistance Program
EPIC · 3 August 2026
Notes from the Asia-Pacific region: China rolls out new AI governance, data protection measures
IAPP · 6 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (28 July 2026), “San Francisco: Don’t Fall for Industry Defense of Surveillance Pricing,” evidence record 14176, https://ethics.ai/record/14176 (originally published by EFF Deeplinks).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.