Explanation-Bound Tool Execution for AI Agents: Server-Verified Action Claims Without Trusting Model Rationales
Tool-using agents expose structured calls but commonly attach free-form rationales. Such rationales are neither authorization nor reliable introspection. We present Explanation-Bound Tool Execution (EBTE), a claim-carrying mediation layer that converts decision-relevant rationale content into typed action claims and checks them against server-held intent, policy, payload, tool, risk, provenance, and freshness facts. EBTE cannot widen baseline authority: conflicts deny, incomplete or uncertain cl
Record details
Published: 28 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 29 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Intent-Governed Tool Authorization for AI Agents
arXiv · 22 June 2026
HANDBOOK.md: A Benchmark for Long-Context Agentic Instruction Following
arXiv · 28 July 2026
Agentic AI Autonomy Assessment: A Decision-Support Framework Towards Governed Supply Chain Systems
arXiv cs.HC · 28 July 2026
Separating Capability from Permission: A Governance Framework for Agentic AI Autonomy Levels
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
Share No More Than the Request Requires: Federated Disclosure for Perspective-Aware AI
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
Constitutional governance for societies of AI agents in the built environment: a research agenda
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (28 July 2026), “Explanation-Bound Tool Execution for AI Agents: Server-Verified Action Claims Without Trusting Model Rationales,” evidence record 14156, https://ethics.ai/record/14156 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.