Agentic Permissions Policy Algebra for Taint Confinement in LLM Agents
Autonomous LLM agents processing mixed-confidentiality data face severe security risks from prompt injection attacks and reasoning errors. While dynamic Information Flow Control (IFC) provides structural security guarantees, traditional taint tracking permanently taints an agent's context upon reading unvetted data, severely restricting downstream utility. We present APPA (Agentic Permissions Policy Algebra), an IFC framework that resolves this usability bottleneck through engine-managed context
Record details
Published: 27 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.AI
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Privacy · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 28 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Share No More Than the Request Requires: Federated Disclosure for Perspective-Aware AI
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
OPERA: Offline Policy-guided Expert Routing and Adaptation for Universal Biomedical Image Analysis
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 26 July 2026
Governed Shared Memory for Multi-Agent LLM Systems
arXiv · 23 June 2026
Self-Evolution for Multi-Turn Tool-Calling Agents via Divergence-Point Preference Learning
arXiv · 22 June 2026
Deontic Policies for Runtime Governance of Agentic AI Systems
arXiv · 17 June 2026
Data Flow Control: Data Safety Policies for AI Agents
arXiv · 4 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 July 2026), “Agentic Permissions Policy Algebra for Taint Confinement in LLM Agents,” evidence record 14034, https://ethics.ai/record/14034 (originally published by arXiv cs.AI).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.