Delhi High Court hands OpenAI a win by rejecting major Indian news agency's copyright injunction
The Delhi High Court has handed OpenAI a major win in its copyright fight with news agency ANI. For the first time, a court has classified AI training as private use. ANI undermined its own case by citing articles published after the models were trained. The main trial is still pending. The article Delhi High Court hands OpenAI a win by rejecting major Indian news agency's copyright injunction appeared first on The Decoder .
Record details
Published: 27 July 2026
Source: The Decoder
Category: News
Topics: Copyright & IP
Retrieved: 28 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Nadella calls out AI labs like OpenAI and Anthropic for banning distillation while training on everyone else's data
The Decoder · 13 July 2026
Microsoft launches its own cybersecurity model MAI-Cyber-1-Flash but still depends on OpenAI for the toughest tasks
The Decoder · 27 July 2026
OpenAI says more workers are using ChatGPT to do other people's jobs
The Decoder · 27 July 2026
Moonshot AI releases Kimi K3 open weights and infrastructure after shaking up the frontier model race
The Decoder · 27 July 2026
Hundreds asked ChatGPT for poison and bioweapon recipes and some got step-by-step high school level guides
The Decoder · 26 July 2026
US reportedly favors selective bans over blanket restrictions on Chinese open weight models citing security concerns
The Decoder · 26 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 July 2026), “Delhi High Court hands OpenAI a win by rejecting major Indian news agency's copyright injunction,” evidence record 13956, https://ethics.ai/record/13956 (originally published by The Decoder).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.