Evidence record 13873 · automatically gathered

Board-level AI literacy as a missing governance capability: a pilot study of boards and executives

Corporate boards increasingly bear formal fiduciary responsibility for overseeing AI-driven strategic and sustainability decisions, yet their practical capacity to exercise such oversight substantively remains poorly documented. This study investigates whether a measurable AI governance capability gap exists between board-level and executive-level AI competence and examines the implications of this gap for the integrity of AI-driven ESG reporting. A pilot study (n = 26) of board members and seni

Record details

Published: 27 July 2026
Source: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 28 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (27 July 2026), “Board-level AI literacy as a missing governance capability: a pilot study of boards and executives,” evidence record 13873, https://ethics.ai/record/13873 (originally published by Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.