Auditing Alignment Controllability in LLMs via Political Axes
arXiv:2607.23519v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Political audits of large language models (LLMs) usually reduce each to one point on a political compass. But that resting point barely matters in deployment: a model must land somewhere, and what counts is how far, and in which directions, its answers can be steered. That steering runs through the system prompt: the personalization layer a platform sets, or one induced from a user's history, not necessarily written by hand. We run a dispersion-fir
Record details
Published: 28 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Transparency
Retrieved: 28 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
KANEx: Translating Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks' Interpretability to Medical Explainability
arXiv cs.AI · 27 July 2026
LEX-EC: A Lexical Evidence-Channel Audit Framework for Zero-Shot LLM Personality Classification in Black-Box Settings
arXiv cs.AI · 27 July 2026
TRuE-XAI: causal and explainable ai framework for trustworthy corporate earnings growth forecasting
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 27 July 2026
Auditing Alignment Controllability in LLMs via Political Axes
arXiv cs.CL (ethics-relevant NLP) · 26 July 2026
A Cross-Architecture Audit of Direction-Based Inference-Time Defences in Vision-Language Models
arXiv · 30 July 2026
A Roadmap to Impactful Pluralistic Alignment Research
arXiv · 24 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (28 July 2026), “Auditing Alignment Controllability in LLMs via Political Axes,” evidence record 13790, https://ethics.ai/record/13790 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.