Evidence record 13790 · automatically gathered

Auditing Alignment Controllability in LLMs via Political Axes

arXiv:2607.23519v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Political audits of large language models (LLMs) usually reduce each to one point on a political compass. But that resting point barely matters in deployment: a model must land somewhere, and what counts is how far, and in which directions, its answers can be steered. That steering runs through the system prompt: the personalization layer a platform sets, or one induced from a user's history, not necessarily written by hand. We run a dispersion-fir

Record details

Published: 28 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Transparency
Retrieved: 28 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (28 July 2026), “Auditing Alignment Controllability in LLMs via Political Axes,” evidence record 13790, https://ethics.ai/record/13790 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.