Evidence record 13781 · automatically gathered

Auditing Institutional Heterogeneity for Generative AI in Patient Education: A Large-Scale Study of 102 US Transplant Handbooks

arXiv:2607.22606v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Health systems are rapidly deploying generative AI assistants that answer patient questions from institution-authored education materials, on the premise that grounding in local content yields consistent guidance. Whether it does depends on a question not previously measured at scale: do the underlying documents themselves agree? We use a structured-output large language model judge to audit 5,730,465 pairwise comparisons across 102 patient-educati

Record details

Published: 28 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Children & education · Transparency
Retrieved: 28 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (28 July 2026), “Auditing Institutional Heterogeneity for Generative AI in Patient Education: A Large-Scale Study of 102 US Transplant Handbooks,” evidence record 13781, https://ethics.ai/record/13781 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.