Towards Trustworthy and Cost-Efficient Data Integration: From Naïve RAG to Agentic RAG
Large language models (LLMs) and AI agents have demonstrated strong potential for data integration in zero-shot and few-shot settings. However, they continue to face significant accuracy and cost challenges in enterprise environments due to a persistent knowledge gap. This paper envisions trustworthy, scalable, and cost-efficient integration through knowledge-grounded LLMs and agents operating within a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) workflow. Here, trustworthiness refers to evidence-ground
Record details
Published: 24 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.AI
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 27 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
SceneActBench: Can Agents Act on the 3D Scenes They See?
arXiv · 24 July 2026
A Self-Calibrating Agentic AI Framework for Autonomous Edge Resource Allocation
arXiv cs.AI · 24 July 2026
DBA-Bench: A Production-Fidelity Benchmark for LLM-Based Database Operations Agents
arXiv cs.AI · 24 July 2026
One Hand Watches The Other: Dynamic Multi-Agent Cooperation for Sample-Efficient Bimanual Manipulation in Dynamic Environments
arXiv cs.AI · 24 July 2026
Skill Self-Play: Pushing the Frontier of LLM Capability with Co-Evolving Skills
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 23 July 2026
SceneActBench: Can Agents Act on the 3D Scenes They See?
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 23 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (24 July 2026), “Towards Trustworthy and Cost-Efficient Data Integration: From Naïve RAG to Agentic RAG,” evidence record 13703, https://ethics.ai/record/13703 (originally published by arXiv cs.AI).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.