AI ethics evidence index Search
Source-linked daily record
Evidence record 13674 · automatically gathered

Ctrip hit with $760 million antitrust fine over market dominance abuse

On Saturday, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) imposed administrative penalties on Ctrip Group for abusing its dominant market position in violation of the country’s Anti-Monopoly Law. The total fine and confiscated illegal gains amounted to RMB 5.179 billion ($760 million). In a statement released the same day, Ctrip said it had received the […]

Record details

Published: 27 July 2026
Source: TechNode (CN)
Category: News
Topics: Regulation
Retrieved: 27 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

Same publisher byline · Shared topic: Regulation

Unitree Robotics moves closer to Shanghai STAR Market IPO

TechNode (CN) · 31 July 2026

Same publisher byline · Shared topic: Regulation

Shanghai registers 11 more generative AI services, taking total to 211

TechNode (CN) · 3 August 2026

Same publisher byline · Shared topic: Regulation

Autonomous-driving company WeRide enters Nordic market through Denmark partnership

TechNode (CN) · 4 August 2026

Same publisher byline · Shared topic: Regulation

SHEIN receives CSRC filing notice for Hong Kong listing

TechNode (CN) · 15 July 2026

Same publisher byline · Shared topic: Regulation

Chinese internet firms sign AI agent data protection pact

TechNode (CN) · 13 July 2026

Same publisher byline · Shared topic: Regulation

Huawei Mate 90 series reportedly to feature new Kirin 2026 chip based on Tao (τ) Law

TechNode (CN) · 6 July 2026

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (27 July 2026), “Ctrip hit with $760 million antitrust fine over market dominance abuse,” evidence record 13674, https://ethics.ai/record/13674 (originally published by TechNode (CN)).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.