How Can AI Augment Access to Justice? Public Defenders' Perspectives on AI Adoption
arXiv:2510.22933v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Public defenders are asked to do more with less: representing clients deserving of adequate counsel while facing overwhelming caseloads and scarce resources. Although artificial intelligence (AI) is often promoted as a means of relieving administrative and cognitive burdens, legal AI research rarely engages with the everyday realities of public defense work. Drawing on in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 17 public defense professionals ac
Record details
Published: 27 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Military & security
Retrieved: 27 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
DeepFaith: Evidence-Grounded LLMs for Faithful Incident Reporting in Multi-Stage APT Defense
arXiv cs.AI · 27 July 2026
When LLM Defenses Backfire: Characterizing Safety, Performance, and Cost Trade-offs
arXiv red teaming query · 27 July 2026
TRACE-CTI: Auditable Post-Extraction Governance of TTP Claims with Knowledge Graphs
arXiv cs.AI · 27 July 2026
Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 27 July 2026
Mapping Machine Learning–Driven Cybersecurity Solutions in Health Care: Scoping Literature Review
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 27 July 2026
AI Deployment and Cyber Governance Failures in Public-Sector Organizations: A Typological Analysis
arXiv · 28 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 July 2026), “How Can AI Augment Access to Justice? Public Defenders' Perspectives on AI Adoption,” evidence record 13587, https://ethics.ai/record/13587 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.