Evidence record 13580 · automatically gathered

Co-design of LLM-based preference agents: participation may drive overtrust

arXiv:2607.21757v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used to simulate human preferences in research and practical applications, raising concerns about validation, misrepresentation, and exclusion. Co-designing agents with the people they represent is a promising way to address these concerns, but participation may also mask the problems it appears to solve. This paper explores that tension through a primarily qualitative study in which 12 participants co-designe

Record details

Published: 27 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 27 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (27 July 2026), “Co-design of LLM-based preference agents: participation may drive overtrust,” evidence record 13580, https://ethics.ai/record/13580 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.