MedGame: Storytelling Gamification Empowered by Large Language Models for Medical Education
Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise for medical education, but most existing systems focus on localized interactions such as question answering or single-turn feedback, rather than organizing an entire clinical case into a decision-centered learning trajectory. We introduce \textit{MedGame}, a framework that transforms static clinical cases into structured, executable storytelling games. MedGame uses a dual-engine design: a Medical Narrative Designer synthesizes case-grounded clinical stor
Record details
Published: 23 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.HC
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Children & education
Retrieved: 25 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Do language families matter? Evaluating LLMs for sentiment analysis through a hierarchical cross-lingual lens
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 24 July 2026
“Antisocial Today and Also Always”?: A Qualitative Examination of Engineering Students’ Social Considerations in Robot Design for Healthcare
Science and Engineering Ethics · 24 July 2026
UCL Global Business School for Health 2026 academic promotions announced
UCL Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation · 24 July 2026
Performance of Large Language Models for Oncology Nursing Decision Support: Cross-Sectional Study
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 24 July 2026
Considering the ethics of live tissue training in trauma surgery
Journal of Medical Ethics (BMJ) · 22 July 2026
Balancing public health and individual autonomy: a study of Chinas vaccination policy
Journal of Medical Ethics (BMJ) · 22 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 July 2026), “MedGame: Storytelling Gamification Empowered by Large Language Models for Medical Education,” evidence record 13476, https://ethics.ai/record/13476 (originally published by arXiv cs.HC).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.