Why point-in-time compliance is no longer enough: Building trust in an always-on world
Cyber risk doesn't pause simply because an audit has been completed, says Craig Rosewarne, MD of Wolfpack Information Risk.
Record details
Published: 24 July 2026
Source: ITWeb (ZA)
Category: News
Topics: Regulation · Military & security · Transparency
Retrieved: 25 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
The Pentagon’s AI Strategy Has a Funding Problem
War on the Rocks · 9 July 2026
AI Agents and the Unseen Work of War
War on the Rocks · 24 June 2026
TRACE-CTI: Auditable Post-Extraction Governance of TTP Claims with Knowledge Graphs
arXiv cs.AI · 27 July 2026
A First Look at Coding Agents' Compliance with AI Contribution Rules in Open-Source Communities
arXiv cs.AI · 29 July 2026
Toward Verifiable Controls on AI-Enabled Weapons in Africa
Centre for International Governance Innovation · 31 July 2026
Problem of (In)Explainability in Testing Fully Autonomous Weapon Systems for International Humanitarian Law Compliance
Minds and Machines · 10 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (24 July 2026), “Why point-in-time compliance is no longer enough: Building trust in an always-on world,” evidence record 13433, https://ethics.ai/record/13433 (originally published by ITWeb (ZA)).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.