Bank Regulatory Reviews: Action Needed to Better Identify and Address Unnecessary or Unduly Burdensome Requirements
What GAO Found The Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 (EGRPRA) requires the federal banking agencies to solicit and review public comments on their regulations to identify and eliminate outdated, unnecessary, or unduly burdensome regulations on insured depository institutions, as appropriate. How Federal Banking Agencies Conduct Decennial EGRPRA Reviews Outcomes from the EGRPRA reviews are often difficult to identify, and their connection to subsequent regulatory acti
Record details
Published: 23 July 2026
Source: US GAO Reports
Category: Policy
Topics: Regulation · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 25 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Trump fires back at EU over Google's $1B fine, launches probe
The Hill Technology · 24 July 2026
Rebuilding America’s Critical Minerals Base
War on the Rocks · 21 July 2026
Crypto bill faces Democratic backlash over new ethics rules
The Hill Technology · 27 July 2026
Kevin O’Leary says data centres use less water than golf courses. The numbers are more complicated.
The Next Web AI · 18 July 2026
Shein Faces FTC Investigation Ahead Of Hong Kong IPO
Above the Law (legal tech) · 30 July 2026
From Google Fines to French Wine: The Trade Case Against the DMA
Truth on the Market (digital regulation) · 30 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 July 2026), “Bank Regulatory Reviews: Action Needed to Better Identify and Address Unnecessary or Unduly Burdensome Requirements,” evidence record 13166, https://ethics.ai/record/13166 (originally published by US GAO Reports).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.