Supreme Court lawyers’ body opposes mandatory AI disclosure in draft AI regulations
SCAORA opposes mandatory AI-use disclosures for lawyers, calling them unworkable. It also flags hallucinations, opaque AI systems, weak accountability, and risks to judicial data. The post Supreme Court lawyers’ body opposes mandatory AI disclosure in draft AI regulations appeared first on MEDIANAMA .
Record details
Published: 20 July 2026
Source: MediaNama (IN)
Category: News
Topics: Regulation · Transparency
Retrieved: 21 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
SEBI warns of AI impersonation scams with fraudsters posing as company CXOs
MediaNama (IN) · 20 July 2026
Agenda: Age Verification and Restricting Social Media for Children, Delhi, 31 July #NAMA
MediaNama (IN) · 20 July 2026
SEBI imposes a Rs 1 crore penalty on CDSL for 2022 malware attack
MediaNama (IN) · 21 July 2026
Lowdown: RBI releases draft guidance on regulatory expectations for data governance
MediaNama (IN) · 16 July 2026
New York becomes the first US state to establish a moratorium on data centres
MediaNama (IN) · 15 July 2026
Lowdown: Australian regulator finds major gaps in platforms’ detection of child sexual exploitation
MediaNama (IN) · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (20 July 2026), “Supreme Court lawyers’ body opposes mandatory AI disclosure in draft AI regulations,” evidence record 12252, https://ethics.ai/record/12252 (originally published by MediaNama (IN)).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.