On Flock License Plate Tracking Cameras
A recent story of a writer who was mistakenly identified, tracked, and arrested using data from Flock cameras has gone viral. The New Jersey plates that were allegedly stolen from the LA dealer were 34 03 DTM , not 34 10 DTM . But when the police report was created and the plate was entered into Flock’s system, it was just recorded as 34 DTM . Just the five large characters, no little number in the middle. And Flock’s AI tech wasn’t registering that non-standard little number when it began picki
Record details
Published: 20 July 2026
Source: Bruce Schneier — Schneier on Security
Category: Field notes
Topics: Privacy
Retrieved: 21 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
MIT to Become Hotbed of AI Video Surveillance
Bruce Schneier — Schneier on Security · 21 July 2026
Protecting Privacy in an AI Era
Bruce Schneier — Schneier on Security · 16 July 2026
Upcoming Speaking Engagements
Bruce Schneier — Schneier on Security · 14 July 2026
Cognyte Sells a Mobile Cell Surveillance Van
Bruce Schneier — Schneier on Security · 27 July 2026
Axon Is Another License Plate Surveillance Company
Bruce Schneier — Schneier on Security · 28 July 2026
AI Surveillance and Social Progress
Bruce Schneier — Schneier on Security · 10 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (20 July 2026), “On Flock License Plate Tracking Cameras,” evidence record 12057, https://ethics.ai/record/12057 (originally published by Bruce Schneier — Schneier on Security).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.