The Optimization Trilemma: Efficiency, Comfort and Fairness in Decentralized Multi-agent Coordination
arXiv:2607.17311v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The problem of fair multi-agent coordination in decentralized settings is one of the most pressing challenges for building efficient collaborative systems. Resource allocation is based on optimized collective arrangements accounting for agents' needs. Such coordination should not only be computationally efficient but also account for fairness, i.e., equitable redistribution of costs incurred by all agents. Recent literature has proposed several a
Record details
Published: 21 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 21 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
The Optimization Trilemma: Efficiency, Comfort and Fairness in Decentralized Multi-agent Coordination
arXiv · 19 July 2026
Learning Adaptive Safety Margins for Visual Navigation
arXiv cs.AI · 20 July 2026
Stress Testing Concept Erasure with Large Language Model Agents
arXiv red teaming query · 20 July 2026
Stress Testing Concept Erasure with Large Language Model Agents
arXiv cs.AI · 20 July 2026
“Antisocial Today and Also Always”?: A Qualitative Examination of Engineering Students’ Social Considerations in Robot Design for Healthcare
Science and Engineering Ethics · 24 July 2026
AgentFAIR: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for FAIRness Evaluation of Geospatial Datasets
arXiv · 17 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (21 July 2026), “The Optimization Trilemma: Efficiency, Comfort and Fairness in Decentralized Multi-agent Coordination,” evidence record 11941, https://ethics.ai/record/11941 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.