CLaC@FinMMEval 2026 Task 3: Sentiment-Augmented Deep Reinforcement Learning for Active Trading -- An Alpha-Reward Approach
This paper presents our system for Task 3 of the CLEF 2026 FinMMEval Lab, which requires daily long, flat, or short trading decisions for Bitcoin (BTC) and Tesla (TSLA) using news and historical market data. We formulate the problem as a discrete-action Markov Decision Process and compare four deep reinforcement learning algorithms: Policy Gradient (PG), Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), Deep Q-Learning (DQL), and Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG). The agents use technical indicators,
Record details
Published: 17 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.LG
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 20 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
When Does Muon Help Agentic Reinforcement Learning?
arXiv cs.AI · 17 July 2026
Agentic Synthesis against Counterexample-Supplemented Sketches
arXiv · 17 July 2026
AgentFAIR: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for FAIRness Evaluation of Geospatial Datasets
arXiv · 17 July 2026
Making Agent-Mediated Contributions Governable: A Project-Level Governance Manifest for Open-Source AI Collaboration
arXiv · 17 July 2026
Traccia: An OpenTelemetry-Based Governance Platform for AI Systems
arXiv cs.CY · 17 July 2026
When Does Muon Help Agentic Reinforcement Learning?
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 16 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (17 July 2026), “CLaC@FinMMEval 2026 Task 3: Sentiment-Augmented Deep Reinforcement Learning for Active Trading -- An Alpha-Reward Approach,” evidence record 11874, https://ethics.ai/record/11874 (originally published by arXiv cs.LG).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.