Red Light, Grey Zone: A Multi-Perspective Interactive Narrative for Autonomous Driving Ethics
Autonomous driving ethics is not only an expert concern, but also a public issue involving risk, responsibility, and governance. However, non-experts often struggle to interpret these issues in concrete incidents, especially when responsibility is distributed across multiple stakeholders. This paper investigates interactive narrative as a public-facing method for eliciting situated ethical reflection on autonomous driving. We present Red Light, Grey Zone, a web-based, multi-perspective interacti
Record details
Published: 17 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 20 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Red Light, Grey Zone: A Multi-Perspective Interactive Narrative for Autonomous Driving Ethics
arXiv cs.CY · 20 July 2026
Neuro-Symbolic AI for LEED compliance: Document-Centric Benchmarking, Deterministic Numeric Checking, and When Multimodal Hurts
arXiv · 17 July 2026
ToolAlignBench: Investigating Alignment Conflicts in Tool-Calling Enabled LLMs
arXiv · 15 July 2026
Social networks and technology adoption: Evidence from online banking
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
The financial implications of open innovation: Evidence from stock market reactions to public companies' open source software releases
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
Gold or green finger? Government involvement in venture capital investments and target firms' green innovations
Research Policy · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (17 July 2026), “Red Light, Grey Zone: A Multi-Perspective Interactive Narrative for Autonomous Driving Ethics,” evidence record 11764, https://ethics.ai/record/11764 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.