Evidence record 11737 · automatically gathered

When Not to Automate: A Formal Protocol for Human Preservation in AI-Optimized Organizations

arXiv:2607.15944v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Standard automation ROI misses four categories of systemic risk -- tacit knowledge erosion, resilience reduction, regulatory exposure, and socio-institutional capital degradation -- that affect long-term organizational performance. PHP-AIO (Protocol for Human Preservation in AI-Optimized Organizations) is a five-gate sequential decision protocol with a final composite check that quantifies these unpriced systemic risks at the role level and produ

Record details

Published: 20 July 2026
Source: arXiv cs.CY
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Jobs & economy
Retrieved: 20 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (20 July 2026), “When Not to Automate: A Formal Protocol for Human Preservation in AI-Optimized Organizations,” evidence record 11737, https://ethics.ai/record/11737 (originally published by arXiv cs.CY).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.