Evidence record 11620 · automatically gathered

When Is Delegated Play Truthful? Within-Range Regret and the Trilemma of Aligned Delegation

Advertisers delegate bidding to autobidders; users delegate tasks to language-model agents. A person describes what they want to an automated proxy that acts in a mechanism on their behalf. This is the revelation principle in production, and it forces a question classical theory assumes away: when is it optimal to describe yourself honestly to your own proxy? We show the answer turns on one quantity, the proxy's within-range regret. The most a principal can gain by misreporting equals the regret

Record details

Published: 15 July 2026
Source: arXiv red teaming query
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 18 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (15 July 2026), “When Is Delegated Play Truthful? Within-Range Regret and the Trilemma of Aligned Delegation,” evidence record 11620, https://ethics.ai/record/11620 (originally published by arXiv red teaming query).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.