MMCRAG-Resp: a multi-modal corrective retrieval-augmented generation framework for explainable respiratory disease reasoning
BackgroundStandard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems only use semantic similarity to retrieve information, and since this method is quite limiting, it may find clinically irrelevant evidence and produce outputs that are unsafe or hallucinated. This drawback is particularly important in respiratory care, where the diagnosis relies heavily on very accurate physiological indicators such as spirometry patterns and symptom profiles.MethodsWe propose MMCRAG-Resp., a clinically grounded, phy
Record details
Published: 16 July 2026
Source: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Transparency
Retrieved: 17 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Comparative Analysis of Expert, Clinician, and Health Care User Interactions With Summary of Findings Tables: Usability Study
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 15 July 2026
Demographically-Conditioned Synthetic Medical Images for Bias Mitigation and Bias Detection in Disease Classifiers
arXiv · 16 July 2026
Parameter-efficient Prompt Tuning of Vision Foundation Model With Adaptive Focal Loss for Interpretable MCI Screening
arXiv cs.AI · 16 July 2026
Self-Evolving Human-Centered Framework for Explainable Depression Symptom Annotation
arXiv cs.HC · 16 July 2026
Clinical Audit Logs as Multi-Axial Traces of Care Delivery
arXiv · 16 July 2026
Prediction of female reproductive tract infections risk among college-going young adult women in Delhi using explainable artificial intelligence
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · 17 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (16 July 2026), “MMCRAG-Resp: a multi-modal corrective retrieval-augmented generation framework for explainable respiratory disease reasoning,” evidence record 11068, https://ethics.ai/record/11068 (originally published by Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.