Request for Information; Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) Regulations
Clinical laboratory testing technology has advanced significantly since the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) regulations were implemented in 1992. This request for information (RFI) seeks input from the public regarding various topics related to the CLIA regulations, including: breath testing; laboratory processes and procedures; emergency preparedness, biosafety and biosecurity, and cybersecurity; and specialty testing areas. Responses to this RFI may be used to help in
Record details
Published: 16 July 2026
Source: US Federal Register
Category: Policy
Topics: Regulation · Healthcare · Biotech
Retrieved: 17 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Invitation to Attend a Market Engagement Event On 8th January 2026 at 10:45 - Digital Platform provision for North East North Cumbria Community OPIP
UK Contracts Finder — AI procurement · 19 December 2025
Business Engagement Consultancy for Faculty of Health and Life Sciences- Expressions of Interest
UK Contracts Finder — AI procurement · 3 November 2025
Tender for the provision of the Technology Enabled Care Service (TECS) in Herefordshire
UK Contracts Finder — AI procurement · 22 April 2025
Healthcare AI Solutions (SBS10523)
UK Contracts Finder — AI procurement · 17 January 2025
Nearly 200 Organizations Back Bill To Expand Access To Clinical Trials
Above the Law (legal tech) · 15 July 2026
Open Joint Letter on the AI Act Regulating AI-embedded Medical Devices
Center for Democracy & Technology · 16 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (16 July 2026), “Request for Information; Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) Regulations,” evidence record 11050, https://ethics.ai/record/11050 (originally published by US Federal Register).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.