Hong Kong steps up to US crypto fund challenge with tokenised fund approval
Hong Kong has approved its first “digitally native” tokenised fund, allowing professional investors to hold direct ownership of the underlying assets on a public blockchain, issuer Baillie Gifford says, as the city steps up its challenge to the US as a global crypto hub. The British fund manager said on Wednesday it had received approval from the Securities and Futures Commission to launch the Baillie Gifford Enhanced Yield Fund (BAGEY) – an actively managed portfolio of short-duration...
Record details
Published: 15 July 2026
Source: SCMP Tech (HK/CN)
Category: News
Topics: Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 16 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Zhipu launches flagship model GLM-5.3 as China seeks Mythos-level edge in cyber defence
SCMP Tech (HK/CN) · 14 August 2026
I investigated Palantir’s foothold in the British state – and what I found should worry us all | Peter Geoghegan
The Guardian · 15 July 2026
Britain’s electric air taxi contender needs more power
Financial Times Technology (headlines) · 15 July 2026
Moneybox is Europe’s newest unicorn, and it’s testing London’s new private market to prove it
The Next Web AI · 14 July 2026
Cambridge university looks to boost UK manufacturing with pioneering wind tunnel
Financial Times Technology (headlines) · 16 July 2026
TikTok faces Ofcom investigation over child age checks
BBC Technology · 16 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (15 July 2026), “Hong Kong steps up to US crypto fund challenge with tokenised fund approval,” evidence record 10878, https://ethics.ai/record/10878 (originally published by SCMP Tech (HK/CN)).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.