Reaction-network reasoning with frontier models for experimentally confirmed catalyst-selectivity hypotheses
Catalysts are essential for sustainable chemical manufacturing, yet discovering novel architectures remains a bottleneck dominated by trial-and-error experimentation and computationally intensive screening. In complex reactions such as electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction, product selectivity is governed by dynamic interfacial, electrolyte, and potential factors as well as kinetic pathway competition. Conventional descriptor-based machine learning and computational potentials struggle to res
Record details
Published: 9 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
DKDNet: Dual Knowledge and Data-Driven Network for Cross-Domain Automatic Modulation Classification
arXiv · 9 July 2026
The Behavioural Reflection Test: A time-efficient measure of reflective reasoning in morally and epistemically charged decisions
arXiv cs.HC · 8 July 2026
UniClawBench: A Universal Benchmark for Proactive Agents on Real-World Tasks
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 8 July 2026
A Quantized Native Runtime for On-Device Semantic Audio Generation
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 8 July 2026
Remember When It Matters: Proactive Memory Agent for Long-Horizon Agents
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 8 July 2026
AutoPersonas: A Multi-Timescale Loop Engine for Open-Ended Persona Evolution
arXiv · 9 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 July 2026), “Reaction-network reasoning with frontier models for experimentally confirmed catalyst-selectivity hypotheses,” evidence record 106, https://ethics.ai/record/106 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.