Explaining Reinforcement Learning Agents via Inductive Logic Programming
Explainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL) seeks to make Reinforcement Learning (RL) policies more transparent and interpretable, a key requirement in safety-critical and human-centric scenarios. However, it is mostly based on user studies, thus targeting the needs of a specific audience and lacking shared evaluation metrics. On the other hand, logic-based approaches within eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) provide compact, human-readable abstractions of decision-making. However, the syste
Record details
Published: 15 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 16 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Behavior Change Content and Implementation of Large Language Model–Driven Conversational Agents in Cardiometabolic Care: Scoping Review
JMIR (Journal of Medical Internet Research) · 15 July 2026
Traccia: An OpenTelemetry-Based Governance Platform for AI Systems
arXiv · 15 July 2026
Do AI Agents Know When a Task Is Simple? Toward Complexity-Aware Reasoning and Execution
arXiv cs.AI · 14 July 2026
Paradoxes of meaningful work in human-robot automotive production lines: Flow versus repair, recognition versus audit, safety versus work precarity in Sweden and Türkiye
Technology in Society · 14 July 2026
MAIS: Exploring human-AI interaction in fair and transparent recruitment with a multi-agent LLM-based system
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · 14 July 2026
How transparency impacts trust in teleoperated autonomous robots under uncertainty
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · 14 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (15 July 2026), “Explaining Reinforcement Learning Agents via Inductive Logic Programming,” evidence record 10593, https://ethics.ai/record/10593 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.