{
  "id": 698,
  "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23375v2",
  "title": "Measuring & Mitigating Over-Alignment for LLMs in Multilingual Criminal Law Courts",
  "summary": "While the wider applicability of LLMs in the legal field is currently debated due to their reliability and the gravity of any errors, narrow uses with well-understood and mitigated risks have emerged. Notably the Swiss Federal Supreme Court uses small on-premises models for tentative translations and short-passage summarization across the four official languages. However, such usage is challenging in the context of Criminal Law. Since rulings and cases employees work on routinely can contain det",
  "authors": "Arthur Wuhrmann, Gaetan Stein, Daniel Brunner, Andrei Kucharavy",
  "category": "research",
  "topics": "regulation,safety-alignment",
  "orgs": null,
  "regions": null,
  "published_at": "2026-06-22T14:08:08.000Z",
  "fetched_at": "2026-07-14T14:14:41.554Z",
  "source_slug": "arxiv-ethics",
  "source_name": "arXiv",
  "source_homepage": "https://arxiv.org",
  "ethics_ai_record_url": "https://ethics.ai/record/698",
  "original_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23375v2",
  "evidence_status": "source-only",
  "attribution": "via ethics.ai"
}