{
  "id": 19186,
  "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12935v1",
  "title": "Decomposition of Evidence, Contradiction, and Fragility in Perturbation Responses",
  "summary": "Perturbation methods explain model decisions by measuring prediction changes under altered inputs, but response magnitude tells us only how much a model reacts, not what that reaction means. The same magnitude can support the final factual-counterfactual difference, oppose it, or arise strongly along the perturbation path yet vanish at the endpoint. We therefore track how the contrast develops as paired inputs are progressively revealed, using the final contrast to interpret the trajectory. We i",
  "authors": "Lei You",
  "category": "research",
  "topics": null,
  "orgs": null,
  "regions": null,
  "published_at": "2026-08-13T08:13:22.000Z",
  "fetched_at": "2026-08-14T05:10:49.168Z",
  "source_slug": "arxiv-ethics",
  "source_name": "arXiv",
  "source_homepage": "https://arxiv.org",
  "ethics_ai_record_url": "https://ethics.ai/record/19186",
  "original_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12935v1",
  "evidence_status": "source-only",
  "attribution": "via ethics.ai"
}