{
  "id": 14633,
  "url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-026-01152-y",
  "title": "Requiem Without an Orchestrator: A Commentary on Hollanek and Nowaczyk-Basińska (2024)",
  "summary": "Hollanek and Nowaczyk-Basińska (2024) analyse the harms of AI-enabled re-creation services and offer four recommendations to providers. I accept their diagnosis but argue that their prescription shares a premise with the industry it seeks to reform: that a responsible provider remains present to carry it out. All four recommendations (retirement procedures, meaningful transparency, adult-only access, and mutual consent) are addressed to a continuing operator. Yet the paper’s own opening example,",
  "authors": null,
  "category": "research",
  "topics": "healthcare,transparency",
  "orgs": null,
  "regions": null,
  "published_at": "2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z",
  "fetched_at": "2026-07-30T05:10:24.387Z",
  "source_slug": "x-philosophy-technology",
  "source_name": "Philosophy & Technology",
  "source_homepage": "https://link.springer.com/journal/13347",
  "ethics_ai_record_url": "https://ethics.ai/record/14633",
  "original_url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-026-01152-y",
  "evidence_status": "source-only",
  "attribution": "via ethics.ai"
}