{
  "id": 12338,
  "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19063v1",
  "title": "Quality Action Assurance: Multimodal Verification of Examiner Claims in VR OSCEs",
  "summary": "Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are the gold standard for assessing clinical competence, yet scoring remains vulnerable to examiner subjectivity, fatigue, and cognitive bias. Standard examiner validation via inter-rater statistics lacks explanatory power regarding the source of errors, as it neither analyzes examiner reasoning nor verifies examiner claims against actual events. Thus, we introduce Quality Action Assurance (QAA), a multimodal framework that verifies examiner cla",
  "authors": "Harry Rogers, Sally Shiels, Ashley Tomlinson, James Thomas, James Aylward, Nathan Gauge et al.",
  "category": "research",
  "topics": "bias-fairness,healthcare",
  "orgs": null,
  "regions": null,
  "published_at": "2026-07-21T12:51:42.000Z",
  "fetched_at": "2026-07-22T05:10:49.469Z",
  "source_slug": "arxiv-ethics",
  "source_name": "arXiv",
  "source_homepage": "https://arxiv.org",
  "ethics_ai_record_url": "https://ethics.ai/record/12338",
  "original_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19063v1",
  "evidence_status": "source-only",
  "attribution": "via ethics.ai"
}